From: Sion Buckler <[redacted]> Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 19:22:25 -0300 Subject: Fwd: Formal Notice Follow Up: Resolution of Historical Dispossession and Fraud – Great House Farm, Llandough, Vale of Glamorgan Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sion Buckler <[redacted]> Date: Sat, 9 May 2026, 19:16 Subject: Formal Notice Follow Up: Resolution of Historical Dispossession and Fraud – Great House Farm, Llandough, Vale of Glamorgan To: , Cc: , , , , , < stephen.doughty.mp@parliament.uk>, , , , , , Paul Egan , , , , , , , , < leader@valeofglamorgan.gov.uk> Sir/Madam, I am writing on behalf of myself and siblings who are the heirs and successors of Mary Williams of the Williams family, rightful owners and occupiers of Great House Farm, Llandough since 1667 until our dispossession via armed force in 1988. I write to summarize our position regarding our historical and ongoing dispossession of Great House Farm, which I alledge involves; - Denial of right to be heard by the land registry due to the fact my grandmother Mr Williams (falsy named Mrs Buckler to diminish the Williams ancestral superior land claim) conveniently died and our family were in mourning in the limited window granted to challenge BP registration of our land and property in their names. Much like my grandfather conveniently died too, before being able to clarify, even to my grandmother Mrs Williams, how her Title ended up in BP's possession. Because until her dying breath she maintained her ownership claim. Despite repeated unlawful attempts over decades to disposition the firm position she maintained about hers and ours undisputed ancestral and superior land claim to the land in question. After my father's appeal of the BP vs Buckler 1987 ruling was dismissed on grounds of "heads BP win, tails we lose" and his home demolished, all money and possessions removed (despite a court injuction ordering nothing be removed) and despite his ECHR request being blocked, and arrest without charge, and hospitalisation and then his convenient death at age 41, our remaining family of mostly women and children, have to this day been too terrified to speak up. According to recently released, supressed ITV news coverage from 1988, bailifs occupying our stolen land and property, even dislocated my mum's shoulder for simply serving them a lawful court injunction. And without the discovery of fraud this year, (which has taken me two decades and a career in military cyber and electronic warfare and the recent innovations in A.I to discover) we had no redress recourse due to the statute of limitation and time passed, ever had we not all been too traumatised like hostages under terrorists to speak out. This whole thing, even unto this day is scandalous treatment of me and my family. Not withstanding I am a war veteran, who left my military career with honours and was employed until 2024 under the Vale of Glamorgan Council/ Welsh Govenrment. Finished my 22 years in Oath BONAFIDE. ITV coverage supressed until recent months also says neighbours report it was like an SAS Style Operation to remove us by force in 1988. And the men in the video do look SAS. I have subbmitee a FOI to the MOD. And Margaret Thatchers administration at the time (you Brit'ish) were evidently helping BP claw assets for the UK Governments exit at the time. Which might explain how 30 police and maybe SAS were used to rip us from our home and land. Land registry ultimately had check balances lifted and total free reign, while BPs lawyers commited purgergy in their declarations to them; withholding information from and supplying to the land registry false information. All the while Welsh TV simultaneously interviewed Ghadaffi in Lybia in 1988, who report him accusing Thatcher and the Brit'ish State of being the real terrorists, not him. My oath ended in 2024, I'm also a Welsh National. I have no allegiance to the British State. If it acts like my enemy, its my enemy. Other media coverage alleged by UK courts to exist from 1974 seems non existence or suppressed too. Fraud and proceedural unfairness are ultimately rampant in the case of my families dispossession. Aside from all my family members dying at all the convenient junctures instrumental to change the outcome of our dispossession, I still have major concerns with how the MOJ just took months to respond only to fob me off last week. Or how the MP fobbed me off and will not provide a proper response. Or how CADW alledge this is nothing to do with them despite failing to list the farm house as a grade II so it couldn't be demolished. As per a 1700 signature petition, which was practically the whole town at the time. Or the current councillor for Llandough failing to properly reply. Or the fact the national archives report gaps and missing and supressed records. Not withstanding Marconi was staying with us while inventing radio and the town won't even out a plaque up to make that known. Which is more erasure of the history. Like in BPs planning application saying our 800 year old former court house home was just an old delapitated building. Not withstanding the supression of the 1870 roman soldier we discovered when changing our floor from stone to timber. Also supressed to hide the sites archaeological significants so housing development could be unlawfully approved. And BP didn't even seek a ruling on ownership, they only saught possession, most likely so that the discovery and significant of the sites archaeological significants could be pretended to not be known until the excavation of our land in 1994. Which is just more evidence of the blatant conspiracy and fraud. This is all the actions of a crime or terrorist network. To install a terrorist cell/ camp. It's worse than just the Brit'ish colonising Wales. Not withstanding the child graves secretly moved from the church next door during the exhivation seem to take 10 years to be properly reported on and even then their numbers in the report seem to be under represented. The scandal just goes on and on. It's the gift that keeps giving. There's court mistakes too. The fancy latin words deminish and falsely describe my nans land claim and superior ownership. And language used clearly shows a bias before a ruling. Language used to imply she is almost imagining her ancestral superior land claim to discredit her in the carefully selected wording used by the judge. In court records that use the false legal fiction name fabricated by BP in their license letters document fraud, instead of her actual name. Evidently to shy away from the Williams name and its superior inpenitrable and unbreakable land claim. For which we remain the heirs and successors. 1667 we aquired the land and property in a 999 year leasehold. And in the early 1900's obtained the superior paper title, free and clear outright equitable ownership, via the deal with Bute Estates quarryman Daniel Thomas. Which led to the tree planting ceremony to affirm this in history. Fredrick Bucklers transfer of Mrs Williams title to BP and their predecessors without her knowledge or consent isn't legitimate and so has no authority. Him not being able to clarify that transaction due to dying doesn't make it right as Mary Williams maintained her position after his death. She just couldn't prove what she claimed without title. And the adjournment and dismissal of the two hearings in 1974 where she made her case, but without getting the ruling doesn't negate the facts. This was a coordinated campaign of fraud, stealth, and administrative erasure. Over decades. Summary of the Fraudulent Dispossession: - The Title Theft: Evidence supports that a "Title-for-Quarrying" agreement existed with Daniel Thomas of the Bute Estate. We maintain this title was later secretly and fraudulently sold back to the landlords by Frederick Buckler without the knowledge or consent of the rightful owner, Mary Williams. - Procedural Fraud (The 1974 License): The 1987 Court of Appeal ruling was predicated on a unilateral "license letter" issued by the landlords’ solicitors. We reject this document as a fraudulent instrument of stealth designed to bypass adverse possession rights without Mary Williams’ agreement. - Identity Erasure: Throughout all legal proceedings, Mary Williams was intentionally misidentified as "Mrs. Buckler." This was a calculated tactic to strip her of her ancestral "Williams" lineage and the superior land rights associated with it. - Exploitation of Mortality: - Frederick Buckler: Died before the truth of the title sale could be brought to light. - Mary Williams: Died during the precise 2-week window required to rebut the Land Registry’s registration of the land in BP’s name—a window we believe was exploited to finalize a theft. - William Buckler: His untimely death following the unfair dismissal of his appeal effectively blocked our path to the ECHR. Our Position: The Williams family has never ceased its claim. We maintain that the land was taken through criminal stealth and that the current registered titles are "poisoned" by this original fraud. We are now seeking full reparations for the loss of ancestral wealth, the destruction of the Roman archaeological site on the property, and the systematic denial of our right to a fair trial. Please provide a formal response and update regarding your position on this matter within 14 days. Regards, Sion Buckler On behalf of and one of the Heirs and Successors of Mary Williams