[Recovered on 19 Oct 2026 from the original email in the family's Gmail, because this archive file was missing. Matched to this entry by its subject line; where several emails share a subject, the order within the group is not certain. Email addresses, phone numbers and private addresses are redacted.]

Subject: WA231076 / WA240304 – request to confirm scope of first registration file records
From: Sion Buckler
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 07:39 UTC
------------------------------------------------------------

Sirs / Madam,

Further to my previous correspondence regarding first registration files
WA231076 and WA240304, I am seeking a narrow clarification to ensure my
understanding of the record set is accurate before any further request is
made under statutory access routes.

I am seeking confirmation of the composition and scope of the first
registration file(s), specifically what material is held, recorded, or
identifiable as forming part of the application record at the time of
registration.

To avoid duplication or misunderstanding, could you please confirm the
following factual points only in relation to the actual file contents held
by HM Land Registry:
Whether a complete first registration application file is still held for
WA231076 and WA240304, including any supporting bundle of documents
submitted at the time of registration.

Whether the file(s) include an index, schedule, or equivalent record
identifying the documents that formed part of the application (whether
retained or not retained).

Whether the file(s) contain any recorded material of any kind (including
correspondence, requisitions, internal notes, or annotations) relating to
any dispute, objection, or competing claim concerning the property known as
Great House Farm / Ty Mawr.

Whether the file(s) contain any notation indicating that documents were
“not retained”, “copy filed”, or otherwise recorded as not forming part of
the permanent archive.

This request is limited strictly to confirmation of the existence and scope
of records held, rather than a request for reassessment of historical
matters or legal conclusions.

I would be grateful if this clarification can be provided so that any
subsequent FOI or inspection request can be properly scoped to the actual
records held.

Yours faithfully,

Sion Buckler Esq. (Ret’d Sergeant)
Heir & Successor to Mary Williams, Great House Farm, Llandough, Vale of
Glamorgan C/O [address redacted], Dinas Powys [postcode redacted], United Kingdom

On Tue, 2 Jun 2026, 01:56 Sion Buckler, <[email redacted]> wrote:

> Sir/Ma'am,
>
> I am writing to request clarification regarding first registration files
> relating to title WA231076 and WA240304.
>
> This request is not a complaint, request for reconsideration, or
> application for rectification. I am seeking only clarification of the
> documents and records held on the first registration file(s), and the
> material relied upon in the registration process.
>
> Please confirm and/or provide the following:
>
> The full list of documents and evidence held on the first registration
> file(s) for WA231076 and WA240304, including the application form (FR1),
> transfer/conveyance deed(s), and any supporting abstract, epitome, or
> statement of title.
>
> Whether any requisitions, objections, cautions, notices, or third-party
> claims were received or recorded during the first registration process.
>
> Whether the file contains any correspondence, notes, or other documents of
> any description referring to a dispute, competing claim, or challenge
> concerning Mary Williams / Mary Buckler or Great House Farm / Ty Mawr.
>
> Whether any personal documents (including but not limited to identity,
> marital, or probate records) relating to Mary Williams / Mary Buckler were
> submitted as part of the application or retained on file, and if so whether
> they were relied upon in the registration decision.
>
> A schedule or index of the documentary evidence relied upon to support
> first registration, including any statement that copies were not retained
> or are no longer held.
>
> Whether any document referred to in the registration process is noted as
> “copy filed”, “not retained”, or similarly annotated.
>
> If this request is not the appropriate route for access to the above
> material, please advise on the correct procedure for inspection or
> obtaining copies of the first registration file contents.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sion Buckler Esq. (Ret'd Sergeant)
>