[Recovered on 19 Oct 2026 from the original email in the family's Gmail, because this archive file was missing. Matched to this entry by its subject line; where several emails share a subject, the order within the group is not certain. Email addresses, phone numbers and private addresses are redacted.]

Subject: Re: Your Ref: EDD Our Ref: WA231076/A/216/MC
From: Sion Buckler
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 17:18 UTC
------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr Gill,

Thank you for your response dated 25 May 2026 regarding title WA231076.

I note your statement that HM Land Registry considered my grandmother to be
the same individual despite the use of different surnames and that “there
is a marriage certificate to show this”.

Please could you clarify:

   1. Was a marriage certificate actually lodged with HM Land Registry as
   part of the registration evidence relied upon by HM Land Registry, or are
   you referring to information held elsewhere?
   2. If such a certificate formed part of the registration evidence
   considered by HM Land Registry, please identify the document relied upon
   and whether copies may be requested.
   3. Prior correspondence and BP licence letters before 1974, to my
   understanding, referred to my grandmother as Mrs Williams. I am therefore
   trying to understand the evidential chain relied upon and how identity
   continuity was established.

I also wish to clarify that my purpose has been to query and understand the
historical record and registration process. I did not submit this as a
complaint; my intention was to seek clarification and challenge aspects of
the historical narrative where I believe evidence may be incomplete or
disputed.

My concerns extend beyond the surname issue. I remain concerned about
whether all appropriate checks and safeguards were applied at the time of
registration and whether the underlying evidence was fully scrutinised.

I understand HM Land Registry’s position that it records interests
presented to it and is not a forum for determining disputes. However, I am
still gathering evidence and attempting to understand how these events
occurred and whether any procedural irregularities existed.

At present I am not asking HM Land Registry to accept my conclusions. I am
requesting transparency regarding the evidence and process relied upon.

Thank you again for your reply.

Regards,

Sion Buckler

On Mon, 25 May 2026 at 13:16, Birkenhead.OfficeMail <
[email redacted]> wrote:

> The document attached is an official requisition, reminder or letter from
> HM Land Registry. It is not a circular and relates either to an application
> you have lodged with us or a property in which you have an interest. No
> paper copy of the item of correspondence will be sent to you.
>
> The document is in 'Portable Document Format' (PDF) which replicates the
> appearance of the hard copy version. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to
> open the document. If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader it can
> be installed free from www.adobe.com. Please note that as the document is
> in PDF format you cannot add text to any document that you need to complete
> and return to HM Land Registry. You will have to return any such completed
> document by post.
>
> HM Land Registry’s purpose is to protect your land ownership and provide services and data that underpin an efficient and informed property market. Our vision is: “A world-leading property market as part of a thriving economy and a sustainable future”.
>
> We check all mail and attachments for known viruses. However, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk. If you have received this email and it was not intended for you, please let us know, then delete it.
>
> We welcome correspondence in English and Welsh.
>
> To see how HM Land Registry treats your personal information, read our Personal information charter: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/land-registry/about/personal-information-charter.
>
>
>