Subject: [2] Re: Supplement to complaint re-served 20 September 2026 — Great House Farm (Tŷ Mawr), Llandough From: Sion Buckler Direction: sent Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:38 UTC Institution: Welsh Government / Cadw Refs: none Archive id: gm-1a0efbfbb19ced15 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dr Wigley / Cadw Complaints Manager, This is not a new complaint and not a chase. It is notice for the stage-one complaint already opened under ticket #628635887: complaint of 17 September 2026, re-served on 20 September after delivery to [email redacted] was rejected, with a supplement sent on 22 September. The complaint is that Cadw’s 1988 assessment of Great House Farm (Tŷ Mawr), Llandough-juxta-Penarth (approximately ST 1681 7331; later HER GGAT02038s), did not adequately address the historic fabric, archaeological context and information then available, and that the building was demolished in December 1988 before any listing protection was secured. I am not asking Cadw to determine title. I am asking Cadw to answer for its own role, decisions and professional handling of the 1988 assessment. What I seek from this complaint, if Cadw is willing to resolve it without referral to the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales, is: 1. A written stage-one decision on whether Cadw’s 1988 assessment was adequate having regard to the material then available and the criteria and process applicable at the time, including the relevant 1979 GGAT excavation record concerning the Roman villa and associated early-medieval archaeology on land formerly within the farm holding. 2. If Cadw concludes that the assessment was inadequate, a written acknowledgement of that finding, confined to Cadw’s own role and without determination of title or third-party liability. 3. Cadw’s confirmation of whether it will ask Heneb to review HER entry GGAT02038s and, where necessary, correct or supplement the entry so that the relevant excavated archaeology is accurately recorded, rather than leaving the site classified simply as “POST MEDIEVAL – Farm” where that description is incomplete. 4. Confirmation of what records from the 1988 assessment Cadw still holds, what material was destroyed, disposed of or not retained, and the applicable retention schedule or rule governing the 1988 file. I do not expect Cadw to rebuild the house or determine the separate title dispute involving HM Land Registry or any successor in title. Those matters belong to other processes. I will await the stage-one response. I will not add further correspondence to this complaint unless Cadw asks a question or the published response timescale expires. Please treat ticket #628635887 together with the emails of 17, 20 and 22 September 2026 as the complaint. This letter adds no new grounds. Regards, Sion Buckler (Ret'd Sergeant) Royal Signals Cyber and Electronic Warfare Professional and Life Member