Subject: FOI/EIR — Great House Farm / Church View Close — s.52/land charges, planning register, EA screening, condition 16–18 chain, 92/00671/RES — new request, not 00210772 From: Sion Buckler Direction: sent Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 21:41 UTC Institution: Vale of Glamorgan Council Refs: 00210772, 00211463, 00211484 Archive id: gm-1a0e9f7a146cba39 ------------------------------------------------------------ Information Governance Team Vale of Glamorgan Council [email redacted] cc: [email redacted] Sirs/Madam, New request under FOIA 2000 and/or EIR 2004. Do not treat this as a reopening or expansion of 00210772, 00211463 or 00211484. Those cases stay as they are. Land: Great House Farm / Tŷ Mawr, Leckwith Road, Llandough, later Church View Close. Applications: 89/01396/OUT (outline granted 13 March 1990) and 92/00671/RES. I already have, or have already asked for, the officer's report, Policy H.2 text, Appendices C–E, the decision notices, and the general archaeological-condition papers. This request is confined to classes that those earlier requests did not name. Please disclose recorded information held, or confirm item by item if not held: 1. Section 52 / later section 106 / land charges Any agreement under section 52 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971, any later section 106 instrument, any deed, undertaking or other agreement regulating the development or use of this land, and any corresponding entry on the local land charges register. Search legal, planning and land-charges holdings, not only the 2026 planning-file scan. If none is held, say so expressly. That is an open records question, not a conclusion that none existed. 2. Historic planning register The planning-register entries that the Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988 required the authority to keep for 89/01396/OUT and 92/00671/RES: the applications, reserved-matters applications, plans and drawings, and relevant decision information. If the 2026 file disclosure is incomplete against that register, say what the register still lists and what is missing from the file. 3. Appendix B Appendix B to the officer's report on 89/01396/OUT: the further GGAT comments after discussions with the Trust. Case 00211463 asked for C, D and E and for a list of annexes. It did not ask for B by that description. If B is not held, say when it left the file, under what retention rule, and whether any copy survives elsewhere. 4. Condition 16–18 chain Named papers, not a general search: (a) conditions 16, 17 and 18 as issued on the 13 March 1990 permission; (b) the Council's October 1990 confirmation of condition 17; (c) GGAT's archaeological warning of July 1992; (d) the September 1992 reserved-matters approval, and whether any further archaeological condition was attached; (e) the 1993–94 papers on whether condition 18 had been discharged, including GGAT's December 1993 letters recommending a breach-of-condition notice. 5. Environmental assessment / screening Any preliminary environmental-assessment determination, screening opinion, or recorded decision that an environmental statement was or was not required for 89/01396/OUT. The application site is described as about 3.4 acres / 1.38 hectares. I am not asserting that an environmental statement was required. I am asking whether the Council made and recorded the determination at all. 6. Archaeological-interest consultation route Any record of the statutory consultation route actually used because the land was recorded in the county Sites and Monuments Record, or was treated as a "site of archaeological interest" under the 1988 Order. I am not asking you to treat SMR status as automatic proof of a particular duty. I am asking what route was used. 7. Application receipt date The Council's receipt record for 89/01396/OUT. The application form is dated October 1989. The reconstructed planning record gives 8 November 1989 as receipt of the application and plans. Please supply the date-stamped receipt, validation or register entry. 8. 92/00671/RES completeness and applicant standing (a) A file list or register for 92/00671/RES showing what the reserved-matters file originally contained. (b) Any sale, option, conditional-contract or authority-to-apply paper on the planning files covering the change from BP Properties (1989 outline applicant) to Ideal Homes Wales (appearing on the 1992 reserved-matters trail), including the recorded BP-to-Ideal Homes transfer of 3 December 1993. This is a documentary interest/authority question. It is not an allegation that the 1992 application was invalid. If a record is not held, say so for that item. If it was destroyed, transferred or archived, give the date, the schedule, and any surviving catalogue. Search planning, legal, land charges and archived/scanned holdings. Please give a new reference and the 20 working-day date. Preserve anything in scope. The public evidence index is https://greathousefarmwiki.wordpress.com/ . I am not asking the Council to decide title. Yours faithfully, Sion Buckler (Ret'd Sergeant) Royal Signals [email redacted]