Subject: Re: FOI/EIR request - Case Ref/ 00211463 — clarification and refinement of request From: Sion Buckler Direction: sent Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 02:28 UTC Institution: Vale of Glamorgan Council Refs: 00211463 Archive id: gm-1a0c1cb194cd5fc4 ------------------------------------------------------------ Freedom of Information Officer, Case Ref: 00211463 — request received 17 September 2026 I write to clarify and refine the above request while it remains open, having now examined the original manuscript of the planning officer's report rather than a transcription. My earlier request named two organisations; the document in fact identifies the correspondents differently, and I ask that the request be read as follows. The passage relied upon The planning officer's report on application 89/01396/OUT (residential development including new access road, land at Great House Farm, Leckwith Road, Llandough, Penarth; outline permission granted 13 March 1990) states, at page 2: "Two letters have been received from the Barry Preservation Society and Civic Trust and a local County Councillor (who is a member of the Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust) making representations in respect of this application and a copy of both these letters are attached to this report as Appendices 'C' and 'D' respectively." The following paragraph of the same report states: "The Applicants' Agents have written in response to the report of the Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust Ltd. on the site and a copy of this letter is attached to this report as Appendix 'E'." What I request Appendix "C" to the officer's report on 89/01396/OUT — the letter from the Barry Preservation Society and Civic Trust. Appendix "D" — the letter from the local County Councillor referred to, together with that Councillor's name. Appendix "E" — the letter from the Applicants' Agents responding to the report of the Glamorgan-Gwent Archaeological Trust Ltd. A list of all appendices ("A" to "E" or further) to that officer's report, so that the complete annex set is identified. Any register, index, schedule or file list for application 89/01396/OUT recording the documents originally held on the file. A further document referred to in the same report The officer's report also records, of the East Vale Local Plan: "The greater part of the land is allocated for new residential development in the East Vale Local Plan (Policy No. H.2.) The information supporting the policy states that buildings on the site should be retained, however were unfortunately demolished a little while ago." I therefore also request: The text of Policy H.2 of the East Vale Local Plan and the supporting information to that policy referred to above, in the version current in 1989–1990. Points on handling These are documents the Council's own report states were attached to it. If any of them is not held, I ask the Council to say so expressly, and to state (a) when it ceased to be held, (b) under what retention schedule or disposal decision, and (c) whether any record of that disposal exists. A response that "no additional information has been identified" would not address a request for annexes that the Council's own report records as attached. I note the Council's letter of 11 September 2026 in a related matter, which stated that "further historical documentation has been found... not necessarily Council documentation but is nonetheless in the Council's possession". I ask that this material be searched in responding to the present request. I intend this as a clarification and refinement of case 00211463 under the Council's duty to advise and assist (s.16 FOIA 2000 / reg. 9 EIR 2004), and not as a new request. If the Council takes the view that any part of it must be treated as a fresh request, please confirm that in writing, identify which parts, and give the revised due date, so that I am not left uncertain which deadline applies to which element. I should be grateful for confirmation of receipt. Regards, Sion Buckler (Ret'd Sergeant) Royal Signals Cyber/Electronic Warfare Professional and Life Member