Subject: 2 of 2 - Unanswered clarification — N610CGV / WA231076 & WA240304 — emails of 26 May, 2–3 June, 30 July and 12 August 2026 From: Sion Buckler Direction: sent Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 22:56 UTC Institution: HM Land Registry Refs: N610CGV Archive id: gm-1a0ac6f29f89eaf9 ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr Haste, This supplements my email of 16 September 2026 on N610CGV / WA231076 and WA240304. It is not a complaint, not a request to reopen stage 2, and not a FOIA request. Please treat points 8–14 with points 1–7 as one live enquiry (also your customer-support refs 260812-6561894 and 260812-6565153). 8. 1971 abstract as listed on the DL, versus the document itself Ms Takeuchi’s letter of 19 April 2026 stated that “an abstract of title listed dated 1971 was lodged” and that the deeds were listed on the form DL. Your 30 July schedule has an A13-DL (WA231076 item 17) but no separate 1971 abstract. Please confirm: whether item 17 still lists a 1971 abstract; if it does, whether the abstract itself is still held, and under which item; if the abstract is listed but no longer held, when and how it left the file. 9. Form 1E / Form 1C / FR1 Ms Takeuchi referred to certificates on Form FR1. Your 30 July letter identifies Form 1E (30 November 1982, item 13) and, for WA240304, Form 1C (item 11). Please confirm: whether an FR1 also survives for either title; whether 1E and 1C are the first-registration application forms; whether the wording “not aware of any question or doubt affecting the title” appears on 1E, on 1C, on an FR1, or on none of them. 10. The 31 December 1969 Western Ground Rents conveyance Ms Takeuchi and Ms Griffiths treated the 31 December 1969 conveyance (Western Ground Rents Ltd to the BP Pension Trust parties) as the root recited in the 1975 and 1982 conveyances. That 1969 deed does not appear as an item on the 30 July schedule. Please confirm whether the 1969 conveyance: is held (give title and item number); was only recited and never lodged; or was lodged and is no longer held. 11. Paper files and the February 2026 scan Ms Griffiths wrote on 13 February 2026 that she had “ordered the historic paper files of the first registration” and was awaiting scanning. Please confirm: whether those paper files were retrieved and scanned in full; whether the originals are still held, and where; whether the 30 July list is the complete surviving set from that retrieval; the procedure under Land Registration Act 2002 s.66 for inspection of the originals, as distinct from paid OC2 copies. 12. Examiner material already identified Your 30 July list includes WA240304 item 7: “Application form D23 (inside exam) and letter dated 8 April 1983 from Linklaters & Paines.” That is examiner/requisition material. Please confirm what the D23 and the 8 April 1983 letter concern, or state that you will not read them and that they should be requested as OC2 items. Identify any other surviving examiner notes, requisitions or file notes for either title. 13. Class of title and cautions at first registration Please confirm, from the surviving register editions you listed (including WA240304 item 10, 23 February 1983, and WA231076 item 23, 13 January 1984): the class of title first granted on each title (absolute / possessory / qualified); whether any caution, notice, restriction or inhibition was entered at or before completion of first registration. Mr Gill’s letter of 25 May 2026 said no caution was received from my family. I am asking what the register editions themselves show, not for a restatement of that conclusion. 14. Amalgamation WA231076 item 14 is an application to amalgamate dated 2 February 1987. Please confirm that WA240304 was wholly absorbed into WA231076, or identify any part of the closed title that was not. I do not need the complaints outcome repeated. I need numbered answers to 1–14, or a written statement that HM Land Registry refuses to examine the documents it has listed. Yours sincerely, Sion Buckler N610CGV — WA231076 / WA240304 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sion Buckler <[email redacted]> Date: Wed, 16 Sept 2026, 23:48 Subject: Unanswered clarification — N610CGV / WA231076 & WA240304 — emails of 26 May, 2–3 June, 30 July and 12 August 2026 To: <[email redacted]> Cc: <[email redacted]> Mr Haste, I refer to your letter of 30 July 2026 (N610CGV) and to my emails of 26 May, 2 June, 3 June (clarification, physical inspection, and preservation), 30 July and 12 August 2026. This is not a complaint and not a request to reopen the stage 2 review concluded by Mr Gill on 25 May 2026. It is a request that HM Land Registry answer the factual questions already put, which remain unanswered. Your 30 July letter listed documents still held. It did not answer what those documents contain, nor the earlier questions that listing was meant to enable. Please answer each of the following. If a point cannot be answered without reading a listed item, say so and name the item number. 1. 1971 abstract of title Earlier correspondence referred to a 1971 abstract lodged with first registration. It does not appear as a separate item in your 30 July schedule. Confirm whether it: survives as a separate document; forms part of a listed item (give the title and item number); or is no longer held. 2. “No question or doubt” certificate Earlier correspondence referred to a certificate that the applicant’s solicitors were “not aware of any question or doubt affecting the title.” Confirm whether that wording appears in Form 1E dated 30 November 1982 (WA231076 item 13), in another surviving document (identify it), or is no longer held. 3. Marriage certificate relied on by Mr Gill Mr Gill’s letter of 25 May 2026 stated that identity was established because “there is a marriage certificate to show this.” Confirm whether that certificate: was lodged on the first-registration file; is one of the items listed on 30 July (give number); or is not held by HM Land Registry and was asserted from some other source. 4. Contents of the surviving first-registration records Confirm whether any of the documents listed on 30 July 2026 for WA231076 or WA240304 contain any reference to: Mary Williams / Mary Buckler; Fred Buckler; William (Billy) Buckler; Ty Mawr / Great House Farm, farmhouse, garden or curtilage; any person other than the applicant asserting ownership, occupation or another interest; possession proceedings, litigation, objection, caution, competing claim, or any question or doubt as to title. If any such reference exists, identify the title and item number. If none exists in the surviving records, confirm that fact in writing. 5. Physical check On 3 June 2026 I asked to inspect the physical files, or scans if the originals are not accessible. That request has not been answered. Please confirm: whether the originals of the 30 July items still exist in physical form; where they are held; the procedure, identification and fee for inspection; and if originals have been destroyed or are not produced for inspection, the date and manner of destruction or the reason inspection is refused. 6. Form OC2 To avoid an unnecessarily broad application, identify the item numbers from your 30 July schedule that comprise the surviving first-registration record, in particular: Form 1E (WA231076 item 13); A13-DL list of documents lodged (item 17); 19 November 1982 conveyance (item 4); Linklaters & Paines correspondence (WA231076 items 16 and 18; WA240304 items 4, 5 and 7); Form 1C and 23 May 1975 conveyance (WA240304 items 11 and 12); A28 / draft entries; the 1971 abstract, if it survives; any examiner’s notes, requisitions, memoranda or file notes that survive. If any of those categories do not survive, say which. 7. Preservation Your 30 July letter stated the listed documents “will remain on file.” Please confirm that none of the WA231076 or WA240304 first-registration material, including scans or microfiche, will be destroyed while these questions and any OC2 application remain outstanding. I asked these questions so that HM Land Registry would either confirm the contents of its own listed records or state that it will not examine them. A further inventory, a direction to Form OC2, or a restatement that the complaints procedure is closed is not an answer. I would be grateful for a numbered reply to points 1–7. Yours sincerely, Sion Buckler (Ret'd Sergeant) Royal Signals Cyber/Electronic Warfare Professional and Life Member N610CGV — WA231076 / WA240304