Subject: Unanswered clarification — N610CGV / WA231076 & WA240304 — emails of 26 May, 2–3 June, 30 July and 12 August 2026
From: Sion Buckler
Direction: sent
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 22:48 UTC
Institution: HM Land Registry
Refs: N610CGV
Archive id: gm-1a0ac6892f9e1222
------------------------------------------------------------

Mr Haste,

I refer to your letter of 30 July 2026 (N610CGV) and to my emails of 26
May, 2 June, 3 June (clarification, physical inspection, and preservation),
30 July and 12 August 2026.

This is not a complaint and not a request to reopen the stage 2 review
concluded by Mr Gill on 25 May 2026. It is a request that HM Land Registry
answer the factual questions already put, which remain unanswered.
Your 30 July letter listed documents still held. It did not answer what
those documents contain, nor the earlier questions that listing was meant
to enable.
Please answer each of the following. If a point cannot be answered without
reading a listed item, say so and name the item number.

1. 1971 abstract of title
Earlier correspondence referred to a 1971 abstract lodged with first
registration. It does not appear as a separate item in your 30 July
schedule. Confirm whether it:
survives as a separate document;
forms part of a listed item (give the title and item number); or

is no longer held.

2. “No question or doubt” certificate
Earlier correspondence referred to a certificate that the applicant’s
solicitors were “not aware of any question or doubt affecting the title.”
Confirm whether that wording appears in Form 1E dated 30 November 1982
(WA231076 item 13), in another surviving document (identify it), or is no
longer held.

3. Marriage certificate relied on by Mr Gill
Mr Gill’s letter of 25 May 2026 stated that identity was established
because “there is a marriage certificate to show this.” Confirm whether
that certificate:

was lodged on the first-registration file;
is one of the items listed on 30 July (give number); or
is not held by HM Land Registry and was asserted from some other source.

4. Contents of the surviving first-registration records
Confirm whether any of the documents listed on 30 July 2026 for WA231076 or
WA240304 contain any reference to:
Mary Williams / Mary Buckler;
Fred Buckler;
William (Billy) Buckler;
Ty Mawr / Great House Farm, farmhouse, garden or curtilage;
any person other than the applicant asserting ownership, occupation or
another interest;

possession proceedings, litigation, objection, caution, competing claim, or
any question or doubt as to title.
If any such reference exists, identify the title and item number. If none
exists in the surviving records, confirm that fact in writing.

5. Physical check
On 3 June 2026 I asked to inspect the physical files, or scans if the
originals are not accessible. That request has not been answered. Please
confirm:

whether the originals of the 30 July items still exist in physical form;

where they are held;

the procedure, identification and fee for inspection; and

if originals have been destroyed or are not produced for inspection, the
date and manner of destruction or the reason inspection is refused.

6. Form OC2
To avoid an unnecessarily broad application, identify the item numbers from
your 30 July schedule that comprise the surviving first-registration
record, in particular:

Form 1E (WA231076 item 13);
A13-DL list of documents lodged (item 17);
19 November 1982 conveyance (item 4);
Linklaters & Paines correspondence (WA231076 items 16 and 18; WA240304
items 4, 5 and 7);

Form 1C and 23 May 1975 conveyance (WA240304 items 11 and 12);
A28 / draft entries;

the 1971 abstract, if it survives;
any examiner’s notes, requisitions, memoranda or file notes that survive.
If any of those categories do not survive, say which.

7. Preservation
Your 30 July letter stated the listed documents “will remain on file.”
Please confirm that none of the WA231076 or WA240304 first-registration
material, including scans or microfiche, will be destroyed while these
questions and any OC2 application remain outstanding.

I asked these questions so that HM Land Registry would either confirm the
contents of its own listed records or state that it will not examine them.
A further inventory, a direction to Form OC2, or a restatement that the
complaints procedure is closed is not an answer.

I would be grateful for a numbered reply to points 1–7.

Yours sincerely,

Sion Buckler (Ret'd Sergeant)
Royal Signals Cyber/Electronic Warfare Professional and Life Member
N610CGV — WA231076 / WA240304