Subject: Complaint of maladministration – defective notice, enforcement process, and loss of opportunity (Great House Farm, Llandough)
From: Sion Buckler
Direction: sent
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:41 UTC
Institution: Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Refs: none
Archive id: gm-19efdb9d4ad37c98
------------------------------------------------------------

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman,

I wish to submit a complaint of maladministration concerning the handling
of enforcement and associated administrative processes relating to my
family’s former residence and land at Great House Farm (Ty Mawr),
Llandough, Vale of Glamorgan, culminating in its demolition in December
1988.

This complaint is not a request to reopen any court judgment. It concerns
the *administrative conduct of public bodies*, including notice procedures,
enforcement execution, and heritage-related decision-making.
1. Defective and misleading notice process

I believe that formal notices issued during the relevant period were
materially defective, including being addressed to “Mrs Buckler” rather
than the legal occupier, Mary Williams.

This created a situation where the intended recipient was not properly
identified in their correct legal capacity, which I believe resulted in a *loss
of meaningful opportunity to respond, challenge, or seek suspension of
enforcement action* at the relevant time.
2. Loss of opportunity to contest enforcement

As a result of the above notice issues, I believe the family was deprived
of a genuine opportunity to take timely legal or procedural steps to
prevent or delay enforcement action, including demolition.

This constitutes, in my view, procedural unfairness in the administration
of enforcement.
3. Heritage and regulatory oversight concerns

I also believe that relevant public authorities had knowledge of the
historical and archaeological significance of the site, including Roman and
early medieval features, but failed to take adequate protective action
prior to demolition.

This raises concerns of *regulatory failure in the exercise of statutory
heritage responsibilities*.
4. Irreversible loss and harm

The outcome of these processes was the complete demolition of the property
in December 1988, resulting in:

   - irreversible loss of a long-occupied family home
   - destruction of potential historical and archaeological material
   - loss of personal and family property and records

I believe this outcome resulted from administrative failings rather than a
fair and properly informed process.
------------------------------
5. What I am asking the Ombudsman to do

I am requesting that the Ombudsman:

   1. Investigate whether there was maladministration in:
      - service of notices and identification of the correct legal occupier
      - execution of enforcement actions
      - handling of heritage-related responsibilities by relevant
      authorities
   2. Determine whether these actions caused a loss of opportunity to
   prevent or challenge demolition.
   3. Consider whether a finding of maladministration is appropriate, and
   whether this should lead to:
      - a formal apology
      - a recommendation for ex gratia compensation
      - any further remedial or restorative measures within the Ombudsman’s
      remit

------------------------------
6. Supporting material

I am in the process of obtaining further documentary evidence via Freedom
of Information requests and archival sources, including:

   - enforcement and court execution records
   - local authority and heritage body correspondence
   - any relevant ministerial communications

I will provide these as they become available.
------------------------------

I submit this complaint in good faith and seek an independent review of
administrative fairness and decision-making, not a reopening of any
judicial determination.

Regards, Sion Buckler (Ret'd Sgt)