Subject: For the Attention of Group General Counsel – BP Properties Ltd v Buckler [1987] EWCA Civ 2
From: Sion Buckler
Direction: sent
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 06:43 UTC
Institution: BP
Refs: none
Archive id: gm-19c0357a12530057
------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Group General Counsel,

I am writing in connection with the historical case of BP Properties Ltd v
Buckler [1987] EWCA Civ 2, involving my late grandmother, Mrs. Buckler, and
later my father as parties.

This is a courtesy notification rather than the initiation of any formal
proceedings. In reviewing family records and related documents, I have
uncovered substantial evidence suggesting material inconsistencies in the
facts presented during the original 1974 proceedings and the 1987 appeal.
These include questions around BP Properties Ltd's title and capacity to
issue the 1974 unilateral licence at the time it was granted, as the
underlying ownership dispute appears to have been adjourned without
resolution. Additionally, there are indications of procedural
irregularities, such as the characterization of Mrs. Buckler's responses
(including her assertion of ownership), inconsistent treatment of corporate
entities (BP Pension Trust Ltd and BP Properties Ltd), and potential
unsubstantiated claims regarding public or media involvement that
influenced the case's direction.

These findings raise concerns under the Limitation Act 1980 s.32 regarding
deliberate concealment or fraud, as well as broader issues of procedural
fairness that could warrant reopening the matter under CPR 52.30 (Taylor v
Lawrence principles). I am in the process of compiling a full evidential
dossier and consulting on potential next steps, which may include a formal
application to the Court of Appeal.

Given the case's significance in land law precedent and BP's historical
context as a partially state-owned entity at the time, I recognize this
could carry reputational implications today. Before pursuing any public
avenues—such as sharing the story via social media, documentary formats, or
legal escalation—I believe it is appropriate to extend BP the opportunity
for early, private dialogue. I am open to exploring a mutually agreeable
resolution, potentially including confidential terms, to address the
perceived historical injustices without further publicity or litigation.

I would appreciate confirmation of receipt and an indication within 14 days
as to whether BP is prepared to engage in preliminary discussions. This
would allow me to determine the most constructive path forward.

Yours sincerely,

Sion Buckler [phone redacted]